Thoughts on Astrology

Since October, I have been reading cards at Pairings Portland’s monthly Astrology Night event. This has been a lot of fun and very interesting, but it has brought up a lot of questions about my thoughts on astrology. It’s been a popular form of divination for millenia, so that’s understandable. Just today, I was reminded of something I wrote about astrology about five years ago when asked about the inclusion of Ophiuchus as the 13th sign of the Zodiac.

From what little study I’ve done of astrology, all the noise that’s being made is pretty dumb. There are many systems of houses and at least two major schools of thought about how your Sun sign should be calculated. The system lacks scientific controls and is too open to interpretation. So I say this: the heavenly spheres are filled with useful symbols and correspondences, and should be used as such. Don’t overdo it by trying to figure out which cosmic influences are making you grumpy on Tuesdays or if the transit of Venus is making you lose your car keys. That’s just goofy.

Solomon's Secret ArtsI’m not sure if people today are aware of how influential astrology has been on the development of Western civilization. For an in-depth look at how astrology pervaded the Age of Enlightenment, for example, check out Solomon’s Secret Arts: The Occult in the Age of Enlightenment by Paul Kléber Monod. Chapter two is titled “The Silver Age of the Astrologers” and discusses the lucrative astrology printing business in London. The numbers are interesting!

filed under: Articles

Tags: , , ,

3 Comments

Arnemancy : Who is Asclepius?

[…] Asclepius was so good at bringing people back from the dead that he angered Hades, king of the underworld and god of the dead. Hades complained to Zeus, and Zeus struck Asclepius down with a thunderbolt. In retaliation, Apollo then slew all of the Cyclopes who were responsible for forging Zeus’s thunderbolts. After some squabbling, Zeus brought Asclepius out of the underworld and placed him in the sky as the constellation Ophiuchus.2 […]

Reply
Freeman Presson

It’s quite true that there are different systems of astrology: sidereal vs tropical Zodiacs, dozens of house systems (which makes much less difference than it sounds like it should), and a wealth of techniques within each system. The difference between all of those things and the crackpot idea that there should be 13 signs is that the existing systems have the internal consistency that comes from generations of practice, whereas the Ophiuchus flap is just a lame thought experiment intended as a reductio ad absurdum of all of astrology.

Reply
Reverend Erik

I haven’t read any of the books about including Ophiuchus, such as Walter Berg’s “The 13 Signs of the Zodiac”. But if it’s a useful symbol set and it seems to work for a practitioner, then I see no problem with it.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *